<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not Easy Building Green</title>
	<link>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/</link>
	<description>Dvisible is an international creative design magazine with a focus on graphic arts, architecture, fashion, branding, fine art and photography.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: MaximumCEO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It’s Not Easy Building Green</title>
		<link>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-29931</link>
		<author>MaximumCEO &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It’s Not Easy Building Green</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-29931</guid>
					<description>[...] D/VISIBLE—On 21st Street, between Fifth and Sixth Avenues in Brooklyn-NYC, New York USA, there is a grey building that doesn’t quite fit with the rest of the scene at first glance. Its stucco facade hits your eye differently than the brick apartment buildings and the old church that neighbor it. This building aforementioned is by no means abrasive like the latest, ultramodern additions to the South Slope (the neighborhood formerly known as Greenwood Heights), but it’s calm rectangles and asymmetrically patterned windows tell you that it’s something newer than its neighbors—it is, in fact, one of Brooklyn’s first green buildings. It is an Energy Star-honored building; its bamboo floors, energy-efficient heating system that adjusts with the outside temperature, recycled carpet, and recycled tire roof decking are just a few of this apartment’s green amenities. Read article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] D/VISIBLE—On 21st Street, between Fifth and Sixth Avenues in Brooklyn-NYC, New York USA, there is a grey building that doesn’t quite fit with the rest of the scene at first glance. Its stucco facade hits your eye differently than the brick apartment buildings and the old church that neighbor it. This building aforementioned is by no means abrasive like the latest, ultramodern additions to the South Slope (the neighborhood formerly known as Greenwood Heights), but it’s calm rectangles and asymmetrically patterned windows tell you that it’s something newer than its neighbors—it is, in fact, one of Brooklyn’s first green buildings. It is an Energy Star-honored building; its bamboo floors, energy-efficient heating system that adjusts with the outside temperature, recycled carpet, and recycled tire roof decking are just a few of this apartment’s green amenities. Read article. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green</title>
		<link>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-42642</link>
		<author>Green</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-42642</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Green...&lt;/strong&gt;

I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Green&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I can not agree with you in 100% regarding some thoughts, but you got good point of view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jei</title>
		<link>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-48835</link>
		<author>jei</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-48835</guid>
					<description>I think green is good, however, I think a good mix of low impact
and modern housing needs to be thought up. I am so tired of seeing
housing designed by some artist that looks better as a picture instead
of a living area. Most of these "green" designs cost more then
most modern homes.

All in all, I think a nice layout with decent space, and a garden
would be a very nice alternative to run down apartments and failing
houses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think green is good, however, I think a good mix of low impact<br />
and modern housing needs to be thought up. I am so tired of seeing<br />
housing designed by some artist that looks better as a picture instead<br />
of a living area. Most of these &#8220;green&#8221; designs cost more then<br />
most modern homes.</p>
<p>All in all, I think a nice layout with decent space, and a garden<br />
would be a very nice alternative to run down apartments and failing<br />
houses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yoyo</title>
		<link>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-63714</link>
		<author>yoyo</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 08:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-63714</guid>
					<description>nicely done chaps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nicely done chaps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-116467</link>
		<author>joseph</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 15:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dvisible.com/2007/10/27/its-not-easy-building-green/#comment-116467</guid>
					<description>Well written, thanks! However regarding 'Green Roofs'....

I think i will get sick to my stomach if one more 'green building' discussion fails to 
recognize the PRIMARY reason green remains unpopular outside of er, discussion....
Its UGLY. A typical green roof is a collection of gravel filled trays with hundreds
of scraggly looking Seedum varietyies. Even more sophisticated designs ignore basic
tenets of landscape design. Its as if Suzie Homemaker conceptualized the layout.
It goes beyond that we are missing the engineering and technology to create green 
roofs people will love; rather it speaks to the utter disregard for WHY people 
choose beautifull things (ie. beautifull landscape design) over efficiancy every 
single time. The day the construction industry notices WHY things like Apple's iPhone 
are so popular(hint, its NOT the cellular network), is the day they will begin 
to shut down these hideous ideas no body gives a hoot about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written, thanks! However regarding &#8216;Green Roofs&#8217;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I think i will get sick to my stomach if one more &#8216;green building&#8217; discussion fails to<br />
recognize the PRIMARY reason green remains unpopular outside of er, discussion&#8230;.<br />
Its UGLY. A typical green roof is a collection of gravel filled trays with hundreds<br />
of scraggly looking Seedum varietyies. Even more sophisticated designs ignore basic<br />
tenets of landscape design. Its as if Suzie Homemaker conceptualized the layout.<br />
It goes beyond that we are missing the engineering and technology to create green<br />
roofs people will love; rather it speaks to the utter disregard for WHY people<br />
choose beautifull things (ie. beautifull landscape design) over efficiancy every<br />
single time. The day the construction industry notices WHY things like Apple&#8217;s iPhone<br />
are so popular(hint, its NOT the cellular network), is the day they will begin<br />
to shut down these hideous ideas no body gives a hoot about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

